North v. Wagner
249 N.W. 494, 264 Mich. 110, 1933 Mich. LEXIS 959
Opinions
For reasons stated in Thorne v. Squier, ante, 98, the judgment is affirmed.
CLARK, POTTER, SHARPE, and FEAD, JJ., concurred with BUTZEL, J. NORTH, J., did not sit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
North v. Wagner, 249 N.W. 494, 264 Mich. 110, 1933 Mich. LEXIS 959 (Mich. 1933).
249 N.W. 494 (North v. Wagner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Scofield v. Starr
63 A. 512 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1906)
City of Kankakee v. Small
147 N.E. 404 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1925)
State v. Phillips
11 A. 274 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1887)
Casler v. Tanzer
134 Misc. 48 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)
State ex rel. Coogan v. Barbour
22 A. 686 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1885)
People ex rel. MacMahon v. Davis
120 N.E. 326 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1918)
Draper v. State ex rel. Patillo
57 So. 772 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Speed v. Common Council of Detroit
97 Mich. 198 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)
Speed v. Common Council
98 Mich. 360 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1894)
Attorney General ex rel. Speed v. Corliss
57 N.W. 410 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)
Attorney General ex rel. Dust v. Oakman
126 Mich. 717 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)
State ex inf. Hadley v. Washburn
67 S.W. 592 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1902)
State ex rel. Burdick v. Tyrrell
149 N.W. 280 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1914)