North v. Vilas

154 So. 245, 114 Fla. 560, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1885
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 16, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 154 So. 245 (North v. Vilas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
North v. Vilas, 154 So. 245, 114 Fla. 560, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1885 (Fla. 1934).

Opinions

Buford, J.

— In this case judgment was entered on a note for the sum of $1,000.00, together with $276.73, interest and also $227.66 as attorney’s fees.

The judgment for attorney’s fees, as shown by certificate of the judge, was' based upon an affidavit in the following language:

“State of Florida,
“County of Sarasota.
“Before me, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Florida at Large, personally came on this 30 day of August, A. D. 1933, J. Irvin Walden, who being by me first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is a practicing attorney at the bar of this Court, and as such he is familiar with counsel fees usually reckoned and awarded to counsel for plaintiff in suits on promissory notes, wherein the note provided for the payment of a reasonable attorney fee, that deponent has examined the pleadings in the above entitled cause and has calculated the principal and interest due and owing on the note sued on, and in his opinion a reasonable fee to be awarded counsel for plaintiff in this suit is the sum of $100.00 for filing suit, plus 10% *561 of the principal and interest now owing on the note, which deponent has calculated to be the sum of $1,276.63, making a total fee to be awarded counsel for plaintiff the sum of $227.66.
“J. Irvin Walden (Signed)
“Subscribed and sworn to before me, the date aforesaid.
“Paul C. Albritton (Signed) “Circuit Judge.”

The affidavit fails to show what amount, if any, had been agreed to be paid by the plaintiff to his attorney for services in this suit. Therefore, the entry of a judgment for such attorney’s fees was' error under the authority of the case' of Sarasota Publishing Company v. E. C. Palmer & Co., Ltd., 102 Fla. 303, 135 Sou. 521.

If the plaintiff shall within- twenty days after the filing of the mandate in this cause in the court below enter a remittitur in the sum of $227.66, the judgment of $1,276.63 will stand affirmed as of date of entry thereof; otherwise, the judgment shall stand reversed and the cause be remanded for new trial.

So ordered.

Whitfield and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Davis, C. J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Boca Raton v. Boca Villas Corp.
372 So. 2d 485 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 So. 245, 114 Fla. 560, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-v-vilas-fla-1934.