North v. Salazar

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEMARUEA NORTH, Case No.: 24-CV-2041 JLS (VET) CDCR #BJ-7624, 12 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST Plaintiff, 13 FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL vs. PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a) 14

SGT. SALAZAR, ADA Correctional 15 (ECF No. 6) Sergeant; S. STEADMAN, Associate 16 Warden; JAMES HILL, Warden, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 Before the Court is a request filed by Plaintiff Demaruea North, a prisoner at Richard 22 J. Donovan Correctional Facility, who is proceeding without counsel in this case pursuant 23 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). On April 16, 2025, the Court granted 24 Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), but dismissed 25 his Complaint sua sponte because it failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted 26 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1). See ECF No. 5. The Court 27 provided Plaintiff notice of his pleading deficiencies and granted him 45 days leave in 28 which to amend. Id. at 6‒15. The Court further cautioned that if Plaintiff failed to submit 1 an amended complaint within the time provided, it would enter a final order dismissing this 2 civil action based both on his failure to state a claim and his failure to prosecute. See id. 3 at 16 (citing Lira v. Herrera, 427 F.3d 1164, 1169 (9th Cir. 2005) (“If a plaintiff does not 4 take advantage of the opportunity to fix his complaint, a district court may convert the 5 dismissal of the complaint into a dismissal of the entire action.”)). 6 In response, Plaintiff filed a “Request for Voluntary Withdrawal” seeking to dismiss 7 the case. See ECF No. 6. Plaintiff claims his mental health status and limited access to 8 legal resources make it difficult to proceed, and the Court’s screening Order made clear to 9 him that his claims are better raised under a negligence cause of action in state court. See 10 id. at 2. 11 REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 12 The filing of a notice of voluntary dismissal with the court automatically terminates 13 the action as to the defendants who are the subjects of the notice. . . . Such a dismissal 14 leaves the parties as though no action had been brought.” Am. Soccer Co., Inc. v. Score 15 First Enters., 187 F.3d 1108, 1110 (9th Cir. 1999) (citing Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 16 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997) (citations and footnote omitted)). Thus, because Plaintiff has 17 notified the Court he does not wish to prosecute his case at this time, no party has yet to be 18 served with any valid pleading, and no answer or motion for summary judgment has yet to 19 be filed, voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is appropriate. See 20 Hamilton v. Shearson-Lehman Am. Exp., Inc., 813 F.2d 1532, 1534–35 (9th Cir. 1987) 21 (“As the rule states, no action by the court is required for dismissal by notice under Rule 22 41(a)(1)(i). A voluntary dismissal by a plaintiff under this subsection automatically 23 terminates the action upon the filing of the dismissal with the clerk.”). “[T]he fact that 24 [Plaintiff’s] filing was named as a ‘motion’ does not preclude its operative effect as a notice 25 of dismissal.” Ramirez-Ramos v. Ryan, No. CV-18-8086-PCT-NVW (JFM), 2019 WL 26 885624, at *6 (D. Ariz. Jan. 18, 2019), report and recommendation adopted, 2019 WL 27 859690 (D. Ariz. Feb. 22, 2019) (“Although the document filed by [plaintiff] was 28 denominated a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal rather than a notice of dismissal as 1 || specified in Rule 41(a)(1), the Court finds this distinction to be without legal significance 2 since the effect desired by [plaintiff] in filing the document with the Court was clearly to 3 his claims dismissed without prejudice.”); see also 9 Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. § 2363, 4 || Voluntary Dismissal—Dismissal as a Matter of Right (3d ed.) (“It is merely a notice and 5 ||not a motion, although a notice in the form of a motion is sufficient.”). 6 CONCLUSION 7 For the reasons explained, Plaintiff's Request for Voluntary Withdrawal (ECF 8 || No. 6), liberally construed as a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 9 ||41(a), is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a final judgment of dismissal and 10 close the case. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 ||Dated: May 16, 2025 . tt f te 13 on. Janis L. Sammartino 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28