North v. Goebel

76 S.E. 46, 138 Ga. 739, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 685
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 27, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 76 S.E. 46 (North v. Goebel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
North v. Goebel, 76 S.E. 46, 138 Ga. 739, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 685 (Ga. 1912).

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

1. A written instrument containing stipulations for paying rent or hire during a term for the use of personal property, with a provision that on making the last payment title shall vest in the so-called lessee, constitutes a conditional sale. Hays v. Jordan, 85 Ga. 741 (11 S. E. 833, 9 L. R. A. 373); Lytle v. Scottish American Mortgage Co., 122 Ga. 458 (50 S. E. 402).

2. “Conditional bills of sale must be recorded within thirty days from [740]*740their date, and in other respects shall be governed by the laws relating to the registering of mortgages.” Civil Code, § 3319. A mortgage on personalty must be recorded “in the county where the mortgagor resided at the time of its execution, if a resident of this State. If a non-resident, then in the county where the mortgaged property is. If a mortgage be executed on personalty not within the limits of this State, and such property is afterwards brought within the State, the mortgage shall be recorded according to the above rules within six months after such property is so brought in.” Ib. § 3259.

September 27, 1912. Equitable petition. Before Judge Edwards. Haralson superior court. January 30, 1911. M. J. Head, for plaintiff. II. J. McBride, for defendants.

3. Mortgages not recorded within the time required shall remain valid as against the mortgagor, but are postponed to all other liens created or obtained prior to the actual record of the mortgage. Ib. § 3260.

i. In view of the foregoing provisions of the code, it follows that a conditional bill of sale to personalty, executed in another State where the property was at the time of the execution of the instrument, by a resident of that State to a resident of this State, should have been recorded in the county of this State where the vendee resided, within six months after it was brought into this State, and record within such time in another county of this State where the property was temporarily was not sufficient.

5. Accordingly, in such a case as is referred to in the next preceding note, where the conditional bill of sale was not recorded in the county of the vendee’s residence in this State within six months after the property was brought within this State, liens of attaching creditors of the vendee were superior to the title of the vendor.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
137 S.E.2d 718 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Jackson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
120 S.E.2d 810 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Colonial Finance Co. v. Anthony
54 S.E.2d 326 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Crowell v. Brim
12 S.E.2d 585 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Hampton v. Universal Credit Co.
1 S.E.2d 753 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Allen v. Dickey
188 S.E. 273 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Stephenson v. Kellett
166 S.E. 457 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Byars v. City of Griffin
147 S.E. 66 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
Fry Bros. v. Theobold
265 S.W. 498 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1924)
Hosch v. Smith
119 S.E. 667 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Burgsteiner v. Street-Overland Co.
117 S.E. 268 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Rowe v. Hancock
114 S.E. 911 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Enterprise Distributing Corp. v. Zalkin
113 S.E. 409 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Bradley & Co. v. Cochran
108 S.E. 624 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
McCrary Co. v. City of Glennville
100 S.E. 362 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Real Estate Bank & Trust Co. v. Baldwin Locomotive Works
98 S.E. 486 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 S.E. 46, 138 Ga. 739, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-v-goebel-ga-1912.