North v. Davisson

62 N.E. 447, 157 Ind. 610, 1902 Ind. LEXIS 204
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided January 8, 1902·No. No. 19,334·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Baker, J.

Petition for the construction of a ditch, by William C. Davisson, J acob Tusing and ten others. Viewers were appointed by the board of commissioners, who reported in favor of the construction. Appellant, Samson J. North, remonstrated. Reviewers were appointed, who confirmed the report of the viewers, with few alterations. Appellant appealed to the circuit court. Trial by the court, and from the judgment establishing the ditch this appeal is taken.

It is shown by the record that all of the petitioners were parties to the judgment from which this appeal was taken. In the assignment of errors, J acob Tusing, one of the petitioners, has not been made a party; and over him this court has no jurisdiction. We can not, therefore, determine this cause upon its merits. Ex parte Sullivan, 154 Ind. 440, and cases cited.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

North v. Davisson, 62 N.E. 447, 157 Ind. 610, 1902 Ind. LEXIS 204 (Ind. 1902).

62 N.E. 447 (North v. Davisson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phillips v. Ball
114 N.E. 647 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1916)
Town of Windfall City v. State ex rel. Wood
92 N.E. 57 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
Lauster v. Meyers
84 N.E. 1087 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1908)
Brown v. Brown
80 N.E. 535 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1907)
Kemp v. Prather
75 N.E. 673 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1905)
Ex parte Washington National Bank
72 N.E. 260 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1904)
Kreuter v. English Lake Land Co.
65 N.E. 4 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1902)
Brown v. Sullivan
63 N.E. 302 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1902)