North v. City of Cohoes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

North v. City of Cohoes

262 A.D. 932, 28 N.Y.S.2d 833, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6520

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1941

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 A.D. 932 (North v. City of Cohoes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

North v. City of Cohoes, 262 A.D. 932, 28 N.Y.S.2d 833, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal from an order dated March 22, 1940, dismissing the plaintiff’s amended complaint herein on the grounds that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the moving defendants and also from an order dated the 16th of August, 1940, which denied plaintiff’s motion to amend the order made at the March Special Term of the Supreme Court in Albany County so as to include the recital of certain affidavits of the plaintiff-appellant which were not included in the decision of the motion. This motion was for the dismissal of the complaint on the grounds that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and the affidavits were properly refused. (Merchants Loan and Investment Corp. v. Abramson, 214 App. Div. 252; Citizens Trust Company of Binghamton v. Merselis, 148 Misc. 676; affd.,244 App. Div. 845.) Orders affirmed, with costs. Crapser, Bliss, Sehenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal from an order dated March 22, 1940, dismissing the plaintiff’s amended complaint herein on the grounds that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the moving defendants and also from an order dated the 16th of August, 1940, which denied plaintiff’s motion to amend the order made at the March Special Term of the Supreme Court in Albany County so as to include the recital of certain affidavits of the plaintiff-appellant which were not included in the decision of the motion. This motion was for the dismissal of the complaint on the grounds that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and the affidavits were properly refused. (Merchants Loan and Investment Corp. v. Abramson, 214 App. Div. 252; Citizens Trust Company of Binghamton v. Merselis, 148 Misc. 676; affd.,244 App. Div. 845.) Orders affirmed, with costs. Crapser, Bliss, Sehenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 932, 28 N.Y.S.2d 833, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-v-city-of-cohoes-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack