North v. Chillingworth
This text of 42 So. 2d 5 (North v. Chillingworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Original proceeding on the petition of James B. North, Sr., and others against C.E. Chillingworth, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, and the State, on the relation of Phil O'Connell, as state's attorney of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, for a writ of prohibition absolute.
Writ denied and rule discharged.
It now appearing by the record on the application for the issuance of a writ of prohibition absolute that the matters in issue have heretofore become res judicata by reason of the former decree of this court in North v. State, Fla.,
ADAMS, C.J., and CHAPMAN, SEBRING and HOBSON, JJ., concur. *Page 49
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 So. 2d 5, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-v-chillingworth-fla-1949.