North v. Chillingworth

42 So. 2d 5, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 953
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 5, 1949
StatusPublished

This text of 42 So. 2d 5 (North v. Chillingworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
North v. Chillingworth, 42 So. 2d 5, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 953 (Fla. 1949).

Opinion

Original proceeding on the petition of James B. North, Sr., and others against C.E. Chillingworth, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, and the State, on the relation of Phil O'Connell, as state's attorney of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, for a writ of prohibition absolute.

Writ denied and rule discharged. It now appearing by the record on the application for the issuance of a writ of prohibition absolute that the matters in issue have heretofore become res judicata by reason of the former decree of this court in North v. State, Fla., 33 So.2d 162, it is ordered that the writ of prohibition absolute be denied and the rule discharged.

ADAMS, C.J., and CHAPMAN, SEBRING and HOBSON, JJ., concur. *Page 49

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

North v. State Ex Rel. O'Connell
33 So. 2d 162 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 So. 2d 5, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-v-chillingworth-fla-1949.