North, Smedes & Co. v. J. L. Gordon & Co.
This text of 15 La. Ann. 221 (North, Smedes & Co. v. J. L. Gordon & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit was commenced by attachment for the recovery of the amount of two promissory notes, and the balance of account alleged to be due by the defendants to the plaintiffs.
Under the writs of attachment, certain judgments which had been rendered in favor of one John Gordon, the transferree of the defendants, were seized as the property of the latter, and certain promissory notes were also seized as the property of the defendants, in the hands of B. J). <& A. W. Roberts, who were made garnishees to the action.
The evidence sufficiently establishes the fact, that the promissory notes, and the judgments seized under the writs of attachment, belonged to the defendants, and had been transferred by them to John Gordon, for the purpose of defeating the legal pursuits of their creditors; and it further sufficiently establishes the fact, that the transfer to John Gordon, was in itself a pure simulation.
Under these circumstances, the plaintiffs had the right to disregard the transfer, and to attach the judgments and promissory notes as the property of the defendants, without instituting the revocatory action and making John Gordon a party to the suit. The transferree, therefore, has no right to complain on the appeal, that he was not legally cited, or represented in the suit in the District Court.
Por the reasons stated, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the lower court bo affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 La. Ann. 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-smedes-co-v-j-l-gordon-co-la-1860.