North Side Sash & Door Co. v. Schuetz

Appellate Court of Illinois

North Side Sash & Door Co. v. Schuetz

189 Ill. App. 379, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 350

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided November 9, 1914·No. Gen. No. 18,730·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Appeal and error, § 1021*—when objection to amount of judgment not presented for review. The objection that the judgment exceeds the amount named in the summons cannot be raised if the abstract of the summons does not show the amount claimed, and the judgment is not in excess of the amount claimed in the statement of claim. 4. Appeal and error, § 806*—presumption when exhibits not included in bill of exceptions. When the bill of exceptions does not include all the exhibits at the trial, the sufficiency of the missing documents to justify the finding of the trial court will be presumed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Appeal and error, § 1021*—when objection to amount of judgment not presented for review. The objection that the judgment exceeds the amount named in the summons cannot be raised if the abstract of the summons does not show the amount claimed, and the judgment is not in excess of the amount claimed in the statement of claim. 4. Appeal and error, § 806*—presumption when exhibits not included in bill of exceptions. When the bill of exceptions does not include all the exhibits at the trial, the sufficiency of the missing documents to justify the finding of the trial court will be presumed.

North Side Sash & Door Co. v. Schuetz, 189 Ill. App. 379, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 350 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

189 Ill. App. 379 (North Side Sash & Door Co. v. Schuetz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.