North Shore Bus Co. v. Flushing Evening Journal Publishing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

North Shore Bus Co. v. Flushing Evening Journal Publishing Co.

248 A.D. 825, 290 N.Y.S. 751, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10037

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 825 (North Shore Bus Co. v. Flushing Evening Journal Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

North Shore Bus Co. v. Flushing Evening Journal Publishing Co., 248 A.D. 825, 290 N.Y.S. 751, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for libel, order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, except as to the ninth cause of action, which is dismissed, and as to paragraphs twenty-fifth, twenty-sixth and thirtieth, which are struck out, for the reason they do not allege any libel against the plaintiff. In our opinion the articles complained of, as set forth in the amended complaint, except as above noted, are libelous 'per se. Respondents may answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for libel, order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, except as to the ninth cause of action, which is dismissed, and as to paragraphs twenty-fifth, twenty-sixth and thirtieth, which are struck out, for the reason they do not allege any libel against the plaintiff. In our opinion the articles complained of, as set forth in the amended complaint, except as above noted, are libelous 'per se. Respondents may answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 825, 290 N.Y.S. 751, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-shore-bus-co-v-flushing-evening-journal-publishing-co-nyappdiv-1936.