North Roslyn Memorial Building Ass'n v. Jannotta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

North Roslyn Memorial Building Ass'n v. Jannotta

20 A.D.2d 815, 249 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4174

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 815 (North Roslyn Memorial Building Ass'n v. Jannotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

North Roslyn Memorial Building Ass'n v. Jannotta, 20 A.D.2d 815, 249 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4174 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In two actions between the same parties, Action No. 1 being under the former article 15 of the Real Property Law to declare the rights of the parties to certain real property, and Action No. 2 being to direct defendants to specifically perform an alleged contract to execute a renewal lease to such property, the plaintiff (in consolidated appeals) appeals as follows from three orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County: (1) So much of an order, dated June 13, 1963, as granted defendants’ motion, pursuant to rule 113 of the former Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint and to cancel the Us pendens in Action No. 1. (2) An order, dated the same day, which denied plaintiff’s motion for reargument of the prior motion. (3) An order, dated October 3, 1963, which granted defendants’ motion, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 107 of the former Rules of Civil Practice (now CPLR 3211, subd. 5), to dismiss the complaint in Action No. 2 on the ground that such action is res judicata. The first order of June 13, 1963 (which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and to cancel the lis pendens), insofar as appealed from, and order of October 3, 1963, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from the second order of June 13, 1963 (which denied plaintiff’s motion for reargument), dismissed, without costs. An order denying reargument is not appealable (Kern v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 19 A D 2d 556; City of New York v. Crown Crane Rental Co., 19 A D 2d 708). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In two actions between the same parties, Action No. 1 being under the former article 15 of the Real Property Law to declare the rights of the parties to certain real property, and Action No. 2 being to direct defendants to specifically perform an alleged contract to execute a renewal lease to such property, the plaintiff (in consolidated appeals) appeals as follows from three orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County: (1) So much of an order, dated June 13, 1963, as granted defendants’ motion, pursuant to rule 113 of the former Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint and to cancel the Us pendens in Action No. 1. (2) An order, dated the same day, which denied plaintiff’s motion for reargument of the prior motion. (3) An order, dated October 3, 1963, which granted defendants’ motion, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 107 of the former Rules of Civil Practice (now CPLR 3211, subd. 5), to dismiss the complaint in Action No. 2 on the ground that such action is res judicata. The first order of June 13, 1963 (which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and to cancel the lis pendens), insofar as appealed from, and order of October 3, 1963, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from the second order of June 13, 1963 (which denied plaintiff’s motion for reargument), dismissed, without costs. An order denying reargument is not appealable (Kern v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 19 A D 2d 556; City of New York v. Crown Crane Rental Co., 19 A D 2d 708). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 815, 249 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-roslyn-memorial-building-assn-v-jannotta-nyappdiv-1964.