North River Insurance v. Connecticut Fire Insurance

Fourth Circuit

North River Insurance v. Connecticut Fire Insurance

341 F.2d 913

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 8, 1965·No. No. 9670·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Connecticut Fire Insurance Company has appealed from so much of the .judgment of the District Court as was adverse to it. North River Insurance Company, the insurer of the used car •dealer, has not appealed from that part ■of the judgment which was adverse to it, but seeks affirmance of the judgment below.

After full consideration of the briefs ■and argument of counsel, we conclude that the Connecticut policy provides primary coverage, as does North River’a. The reason for our conclusion is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the District Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The Connecticut Fire Insurance Company has appealed from so much of the .judgment of the District Court as was adverse to it. North River Insurance Company, the insurer of the used car •dealer, has not appealed from that part ■of the judgment which was adverse to it, but seeks affirmance of the judgment below.

After full consideration of the briefs ■and argument of counsel, we conclude that the Connecticut policy provides primary coverage, as does North River’a. The reason for our conclusion is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the District Court.

Affirmed.

North River Insurance v. Connecticut Fire Insurance, 341 F.2d 913 (4th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

341 F.2d 913 (North River Insurance v. Connecticut Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related