North River Insurance v. Connecticut Fire Insurance
This text of 341 F.2d 913 (North River Insurance v. Connecticut Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Connecticut Fire Insurance Company has appealed from so much of the .judgment of the District Court as was adverse to it. North River Insurance Company, the insurer of the used car •dealer, has not appealed from that part ■of the judgment which was adverse to it, but seeks affirmance of the judgment below.
After full consideration of the briefs ■and argument of counsel, we conclude that the Connecticut policy provides primary coverage, as does North River’a. The reason for our conclusion is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the District Court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
341 F.2d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-river-insurance-v-connecticut-fire-insurance-ca4-1965.