North Pacific Coast Railroad v. Gardner

21 P. 735, 79 Cal. 213, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 702
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMay 22, 1889
DocketNo. 12966
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 21 P. 735 (North Pacific Coast Railroad v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
North Pacific Coast Railroad v. Gardner, 21 P. 735, 79 Cal. 213, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 702 (Cal. 1889).

Opinion

Thornton, J.

We do not feel clear that a court of a justice of the peace can compel, on motion, a sheriff to execute a judgment rendered in such court, and punish him for contempt on his failure to obey its order. In such case, the party seeking the enforcement of his judgment can apply to the superior court for a writ of mandate (on the refusal of the sheriff to execute the writ of execution) to compel him to execute it.

We find no error in the record.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Sharpstein, J., Works, J., and McFarland, J., concurred.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Magnaud v. Traeger
226 P. 990 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)
Seagraves v. Scarborough
190 S.W. 1154 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
State ex rel. Clement v. Stokes
73 S.W. 254 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 P. 735, 79 Cal. 213, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-pacific-coast-railroad-v-gardner-cal-1889.