North Pacific Coast Railroad v. Gardner

21 P. 735, 79 Cal. 213, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 702
California Supreme Court·Decided May 22, 1889·No. No. 12966·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Thornton, J.

We do not feel clear that a court of a justice of the peace can compel, on motion, a sheriff to execute a judgment rendered in such court, and punish him for contempt on his failure to obey its order. In such case, the party seeking the enforcement of his judgment can apply to the superior court for a writ of mandate (on the refusal of the sheriff to execute the writ of execution) to compel him to execute it.

We find no error in the record.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Sharpstein, J., Works, J., and McFarland, J., concurred.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

North Pacific Coast Railroad v. Gardner, 21 P. 735, 79 Cal. 213, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 702 (Cal. 1889).

21 P. 735 (North Pacific Coast Railroad v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Magnaud v. Traeger
226 P. 990 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)
Seagraves v. Scarborough
190 S.W. 1154 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
State ex rel. Clement v. Stokes
73 S.W. 254 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)