North P. S. S. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

California Court of Appeal

North P. S. S. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

168 P. 30, 34 Cal. App. 488, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 59

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedAugust 27, 1917

DocketCiv. No. 2213.

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 168 P. 30 (North P. S. S. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

North P. S. S. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 168 P. 30, 34 Cal. App. 488, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 59 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Conceding that the record upon this application for a writ of review directed to the Industrial Accident Commission shows that the award of the commission on its face was beyond and in excess of the jurisdiction of the commission, nevertheless it also appears that the petition for the writ to this court was not made within the thirty days after the award of the commission as prescribed by the statute. That statute, we think, must be regarded as a statute of limitations in so far as the right of the petitioner to apply for the writ is concerned, and the application has not been made within the statutory time. We are compelled, therefore, to dismiss the writ, and that will be the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conceding that the record upon this application for a writ of review directed to the Industrial Accident Commission shows that the award of the commission on its face was beyond and in excess of the jurisdiction of the commission, nevertheless it also appears that the petition for the writ to this court was not made within the thirty days after the award of the commission as prescribed by the statute. That statute, we think, must be regarded as a statute of limitations in so far as the right of the petitioner to apply for the writ is concerned, and the application has not been made within the statutory time. We are compelled, therefore, to dismiss the writ, and that will be the order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 P. 30, 34 Cal. App. 488, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-p-s-s-co-v-industrial-acc-com-calctapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack