North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. Brann

92 S.E.2d 146, 243 N.C. 758, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 619
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 11, 1956·No. 379·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PeR CüRiam.

The exceptions contained in the entries of appeal are broadside in nature and therefore present no question of law for this Court to decide. The exceptions to specific findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the court below were not entered until the petitioner filed its case on appeal. They came too late and must be disregarded. No error appears on the face of the record.

Conceding — but not deciding — that the judge below might have reached a contrary conclusion, we are constrained to hold that the findings of fact and conclusions of law are supported by competent evidence. Hence decision here is controlled by the line of cases represented by Highway Commission v. Pardington, 242 N.C. 482, 88 S.E. 2d 102. Therefore, the judgment entered is affirmed on authority of the well-reasoned opinion by Winborne, J., in the Pardington case.

Affirmed.

Devin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. Brann, 92 S.E.2d 146, 243 N.C. 758, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 619 (N.C. 1956).

92 S.E.2d 146 (North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. Brann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Johnson
179 S.E.2d 371 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
North Carolina State Highway Commission v. Nuckles
155 S.E.2d 772 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. Nuckles
155 S.E.2d 772 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
Travis v. Johnston
95 S.E.2d 94 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)