North Carolina State Bar v. Burford

747 S.E.2d 573, 367 N.C. 217, 2013 WL 4781751, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 958
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided August 27, 2013·No. 184P13·Published

Opinion

1. Def’s Pro Se and Attorney NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA12909)

2. Def’s Pro Se and Attorney PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Def’s Pro Se Motion to Amend NOA and PDR

1. Dismissed Ex Mero Motu

2. Denied

3. Denied

Martin, J. and Beasley, J., Recused

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

North Carolina State Bar v. Burford, 747 S.E.2d 573, 367 N.C. 217, 2013 WL 4781751, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 958 (N.C. 2013).

747 S.E.2d 573 (North Carolina State Bar v. Burford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 7A-31
North Carolina § 7A-31