North Carolina National Bank v. Morgan
This text of 263 S.E.2d 576 (North Carolina National Bank v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Justice Copeland, having recused himself, did not participate in the consideration and decision of this case. The remaining six justices are equally divided as to whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the judgment of the trial court. Therefore, in accordance with our practice, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed; but it should not be considered to have precedential value. See State v. Insurance Co., 298 N.C. 270, 258 S.E. 2d 343 (1979) and cases therein cited.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 S.E.2d 576, 299 N.C. 541, 1980 N.C. LEXIS 941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-carolina-national-bank-v-morgan-nc-1980.