North Carolina Mutual & Provident Ass'n v. Ross

171 S.E. 304, 47 Ga. App. 692, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 603
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 6, 1933
Docket23127
StatusPublished

This text of 171 S.E. 304 (North Carolina Mutual & Provident Ass'n v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
North Carolina Mutual & Provident Ass'n v. Ross, 171 S.E. 304, 47 Ga. App. 692, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 603 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are merely in elaboration of the general grounds of the motion. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial court and no error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., eonmr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 S.E. 304, 47 Ga. App. 692, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-carolina-mutual-provident-assn-v-ross-gactapp-1933.