North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank v. Shuford

204 N.C. 796
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 10, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per CuriaM.

Error is assigned (1) “to tbe issues as answered by tbe jury”; (2) “to tbe refusal of tbe court to set aside tbe verdict as contrary to tbe weight of the evidence”; and (3) “to tbe judgment as signed by tbe court.”

Tbe only error suggested in appellant’s brief is tbe refusal of tbe court to set aside tbe verdict as contrary to tbe weight of tbe evidence. This was a matter addressed to tbe discretion of tbe trial court, and is not reviewable on appeal. Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N. C., 808, 161 S. E., 686; Whitted v. Fuquay, 127 N. C., 68, 37 S. E., 141.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank v. Shuford, 204 N.C. 796 (N.C. 1933).

204 N.C. 796 (North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank v. Shuford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitted v. Fuquay.
37 S.E. 141 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1900)
Goodman v. . Goodman
161 S.E. 686 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)