North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank of Durham v. Cox

204 N.C. 335
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 8, 1933·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The appeal in the present case is controlled by the principle stated in Ins. Co. v. Forbes, 203 N. C., 252, and West v. Jackson, 198 N. C., 693. In the latter case the Court said: “There are perhaps hundreds of deeds of trust in the State indexed and cross-indexed in the same manner employed in the present case, and we are not inclined to strike down those instruments as a matter of law, particularly when there was sufficient information upon the index and cross-index to create the duty of making inquiry.” By inquiry or otherwise the plaintiffs ascertained that Effie Carson was T. A. Carson’s wife, for the fact is set out not only in the premises of the deed under which the plaintiffs claim but in a reference to a map attached to the abstract of T. A. Carson and Effie Carson filed with the North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank of Durham. Moreover, the index of the defendant’s mortgage is as nearly a compliance with the law as is that of plaintiffs’ deed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank of Durham v. Cox, 204 N.C. 335 (N.C. 1933).

204 N.C. 335 (North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank of Durham v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

West v. . Jackson
153 S.E. 257 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Forbes
165 S.E. 699 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)