North Carolina Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Twin States Development Corp.

347 S.E.2d 97, 289 S.C. 480, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 441
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 8, 1986·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This is an appeal from an order of reference in a mortgage foreclosure action. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal, on the ground the order is not subject to immediate appeal. We grant the motion to dismiss. See Williford v. Downs, 265 S. C. 319, 218, S. E. (2d) 242 (1975); Collier v. Green, 244 S. C. 367, 137 S. E. (2d) 277 (1964).

In support of its motion, respondent argues that Rule 72, SCRCP, does not authorize immediate appeal of the trial court’s order.

Rule 72 reads: “Appeal may be taken, as provided by law, from any final judgment or order dismissing an action under these rules” (emphasis supplied).

The right of appeal arises from and is controlled by statutory law. The jurisdiction of appellate courts is prescribed by S. C. Code Ann. § 14-3-330 (1976) and is defined in numerous decisions of this Court and the Court of Appeals. Rule 82(a), SCRCP, specifically provides that “These rules shall not be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of any court of this state ...”

The jurisdictional rights of appeal continue to be controlled by S. C. Code §14-3-330.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

North Carolina Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Twin States Development Corp., 347 S.E.2d 97, 289 S.C. 480, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 441 (S.C. 1986).

347 S.E.2d 97 (North Carolina Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Twin States Development Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TD Bank v. Farm Hill Associates
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2013
State v. Wilson
693 S.E.2d 923 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2010)
Skinner v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
668 S.E.2d 795 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2008)
Wright v. Dickey
636 S.E.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2006)
Wallace v. Beaver
630 S.E.2d 464 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2006)
Ex Parte Capital U-Drive-It, Inc.
630 S.E.2d 464 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2006)
Hagood v. Sommerville
607 S.E.2d 707 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2005)
Woodard v. Westvaco Corp.
433 S.E.2d 890 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1993)
Gowens v. Gowens
366 S.E.2d 29 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1988)
Jefferson v. Gene's Used Cars, Inc.
368 S.E.2d 456 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1988)
Moyd v. Johnson
347 S.E.2d 97 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)