North Broward Radiologists, P.A. v. Rush

District Court of Appeal of Florida

North Broward Radiologists, P.A. v. Rush

566 So. 2d 610, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7042, 1990 WL 133814

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in North Broward Radiologists, P.A. v. Rush. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 Fla. L. Weekly 787 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 19, 1990·No. No. 89-3052·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order striking a renewed motion for temporary injunction. It is apparently undisputed that the reason for the trial court’s decision was the conclusion that this court’s prior opinion in this case, North Broward Radiologists v. Rush, 541 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), was the law of the case precluding entry of a temporary injunction.

However, it is clear upon review that the temporary injunction issues were not addressed at all in our earlier opinion. That opinion simply decided that the complaint stated a cause of action, reversing a dismissal of the complaint.

Therefore, the order striking the renewed motion is reversed. We express no opinion regarding the merits of other grounds for the motion to strike or the motion for temporary injunction.

ANSTEAD, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order striking a renewed motion for temporary injunction. It is apparently undisputed that the reason for the trial court’s decision was the conclusion that this court’s prior opinion in this case, North Broward Radiologists v. Rush, 541 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), was the law of the case precluding entry of a temporary injunction.

However, it is clear upon review that the temporary injunction issues were not addressed at all in our earlier opinion. That opinion simply decided that the complaint stated a cause of action, reversing a dismissal of the complaint.

Therefore, the order striking the renewed motion is reversed. We express no opinion regarding the merits of other grounds for the motion to strike or the motion for temporary injunction.

ANSTEAD, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

North Broward Radiologists, P.A. v. Rush, 566 So. 2d 610, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7042, 1990 WL 133814 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

566 So. 2d 610 (North Broward Radiologists, P.A. v. Rush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related