North Bridgewater
This text of 1 Rep. Cont. El. 264 (North Bridgewater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts House of Representatives primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The election of John Goldsbury, returned a member from the town of North Bridgewater, was controverted by Thomas Wales and others, on the ground, that two persons voted in the election, who had not been resident within the said town for six calendar months next preceding, and also, that said Goldsbury did not possess sufficient estate to render him eligible as a representative ; in relation to which latter point, the petitioners alleged, that the said Goldsbury had, within eight months, declared to one of the assessors of the said town, that he was not seized or possessed of any ratable estate.
The committee on elections reported, at the January session, that no evidence whatever had been produced by the petitioners against the election or qualifications of Mr. Goldsbury, and therefore that he was entitled to his seat. The report was agreed to.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Rep. Cont. El. 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-bridgewater-masshserep-1831.