North Asheboro-Central Falls Sanitary District v. Canoy
This text of 119 S.E.2d 448 (North Asheboro-Central Falls Sanitary District v. Canoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an assignment of error, “(a)lways the very error relied upon should be definitely and clearly presented, and the Court not compelled to go beyond the assignment itself to learn what the question is.” Allen v. Allen, 244 N.C. 446, 450, 94 S.E. 2d 325; Steelman v. Benfield, 228 N.C. 651, 653, 46 S.E. 2d 829, and cases cited. Many of petitioner’s assignments of error are defective in that they do not point out in what respect petitioner considers erroneous the court’s rulings or instructions. Notwithstanding these deficiencies, each of petitioners’ exceptions has been carefully considered. Suffice to say, we find no error of law deemed sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 S.E.2d 448, 254 N.C. 630, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-asheboro-central-falls-sanitary-district-v-canoy-nc-1961.