North American Mercantile Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

North American Mercantile Co. v. United States

12 Cust. Ct. 444, 1944 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 490

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 8, 1944

DocketNo. 6000; Entry Nos. 721974 and 740866

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Cust. Ct. 444 (North American Mercantile Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

North American Mercantile Co. v. United States, 12 Cust. Ct. 444, 1944 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 490 (cusc 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Cole, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been limited by written stipulation filed on April 27, 1944, to canned clams packed [445]*4455 ounces to the tin, and represented by the invoice items marked A and initialed FHL, the parties agreeing that said merchandise is thé same in all material respects as the clams packed 5 ounces to the can which were involved in United States v. Mutual Supply Co. et al. and Mutual Supply Co. et al. v. United States, Reap. Dec. 5950, and that the record therein may be incorporated here.

In the cited case appraisement was made on the basis of American selling price, section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (g)), pursuant to the provisions of a Presidential proclamation, T. D. 47031, which decreed such basis for appraisement of “clams other than razor clams” to equalize the differences in-cost of production between foreign products and like or similar ones of domestic origin.

It is further agreed between the parties that the market conditions and prices in this country, relating to the instant merchandise, were the same at the time of its exportation, as -those established in the incorporated case.

On the stipulated facts, I hold American selling price as defined in Bection 402 (g), supra, to be the proper basis for appraisement for the merchandise referred to, and that such statutory value is $1 per dozen cans, less IK per centum cash discount.

The appeals having been abandoned as to all other'merchandise, they are dismissed so far as they relate thereto.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been limited by written stipulation filed on April 27, 1944, to canned clams packed [445]*4455 ounces to the tin, and represented by the invoice items marked A and initialed FHL, the parties agreeing that said merchandise is thé same in all material respects as the clams packed 5 ounces to the can which were involved in United States v. Mutual Supply Co. et al. and Mutual Supply Co. et al. v. United States, Reap. Dec. 5950, and that the record therein may be incorporated here.

In the cited case appraisement was made on the basis of American selling price, section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (g)), pursuant to the provisions of a Presidential proclamation, T. D. 47031, which decreed such basis for appraisement of “clams other than razor clams” to equalize the differences in-cost of production between foreign products and like or similar ones of domestic origin.

It is further agreed between the parties that the market conditions and prices in this country, relating to the instant merchandise, were the same at the time of its exportation, as -those established in the incorporated case.

On the stipulated facts, I hold American selling price as defined in Bection 402 (g), supra, to be the proper basis for appraisement for the merchandise referred to, and that such statutory value is $1 per dozen cans, less IK per centum cash discount.

The appeals having been abandoned as to all other'merchandise, they are dismissed so far as they relate thereto.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Cust. Ct. 444, 1944 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-american-mercantile-co-v-united-states-cusc-1944.