North American Marine, Inc. v. the Charles Heard Law Firm, PC and Charles Heard
This text of North American Marine, Inc. v. the Charles Heard Law Firm, PC and Charles Heard (North American Marine, Inc. v. the Charles Heard Law Firm, PC and Charles Heard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-15-00034-CV ____________________
NORTH AMERICAN MARINE, INC., Appellant
V.
THE CHARLES HEARD LAW FIRM, PC AND CHARLES HEARD, Appellees _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 14-03-02705 CV ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, North American Marine, Inc., and appellees, The Charles Heard
Law Firm, PC and Charles Heard, filed a joint agreed motion to vacate the trial
court’s default judgment and to remand the case to the trial court for further
proceedings. The parties represent that the appellant properly and timely perfected
this restricted appeal and that reversible error is clearly present on the face of the
record. See Tex. R. App. P. 30; see also Ins. Co. of State of Pa. v. Lejeune, 297
1 S.W.3d 254, 255 (Tex. 2009). The parties jointly request that we vacate the trial
court’s default judgment, remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings, and order that each party bear its own costs and fees incurred as a
result of this restricted appeal. See Wilson v. Am. Builders & Contractors Supply
Co., Inc., No. 01-12-00537-CV, 2012 WL 3234059, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston
[1st Dist.] Aug. 9, 2012, no pet.). We therefore vacate the judgment of the trial
court and remand this cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion,
and order that each party bear its own costs and fees incurred as a result of this
restricted appeal.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice
Submitted on April 8, 2015 Opinion Delivered April 9, 2015
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
North American Marine, Inc. v. the Charles Heard Law Firm, PC and Charles Heard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-american-marine-inc-v-the-charles-heard-law--texapp-2015.