North American Holding Corp. v. Murdock
160 N.E.2d 926, 6 N.Y.2d 902, 190 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1193
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
North American Holding Corp. v. Murdock, 160 N.E.2d 926, 6 N.Y.2d 902, 190 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1193 (N.Y. 1959).
160 N.E.2d 926 (North American Holding Corp. v. Murdock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Acusport, Inc.
271 F. Supp. 2d 435 (E.D. New York, 2003)
NAACP v. AcuSport, Inc.
271 F. Supp. 2d 435 (E.D. New York, 2003)
High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of Albuquerque
888 P.2d 475 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1994)
HIGH BIDGE HINKLE JT. VENT. v. Albuquerque
888 P.2d 475 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1994)
M & M Auto Storage Pool, Inc. v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
791 P.2d 665 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1990)
Revenue Cabinet v. Moors Resort, Inc.
662 S.W.2d 219 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1983)
MATTER OF N. AM. HOLDING CORP. v. Murdock
160 N.E.2d 926 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)