North American Co. v. Pennington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

North American Co. v. Pennington

133 A.D.2d 547, 518 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50077

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 A.D.2d 547 (North American Co. v. Pennington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

North American Co. v. Pennington, 133 A.D.2d 547, 518 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50077 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion for clarification or modification granted to extent of amending the first sentence of the memorandum decision dated July 10, 1987 [132 AD2d 972] to read as follows: "Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for commissions paid in excess of those provided by the written agreement between the parties and to dismiss defendant’s third and fourth counterclaims should have been granted.” The ordering paragraph of the remittitur order heretofore entered July 10, 1987 is amended to read as follows: "It is hereby ordered, That the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law to grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for commissions paid in excess of those provided by the written agreement and to dismiss defendant’s [548]*548third and fourth counterclaims, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs. Memorandum which is hereby made a part hereof.” Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion for clarification or modification granted to extent of amending the first sentence of the memorandum decision dated July 10, 1987 [132 AD2d 972] to read as follows: "Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for commissions paid in excess of those provided by the written agreement between the parties and to dismiss defendant’s third and fourth counterclaims should have been granted.” The ordering paragraph of the remittitur order heretofore entered July 10, 1987 is amended to read as follows: "It is hereby ordered, That the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law to grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for commissions paid in excess of those provided by the written agreement and to dismiss defendant’s [548]*548third and fourth counterclaims, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs. Memorandum which is hereby made a part hereof.” Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A.D.2d 547, 518 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-american-co-v-pennington-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack