North American Chemical Co. v. Dexter

252 F. 148, 1916 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 908
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin·Decided August 1, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GEIGER, District Judge.

The plaintiff, as owner of Thoma patents, 808,224, December 26, 1905, covering “art of filling shoes”; 832,002, September 25, 1906, covering “shoe filler package and process of making same”; 861,555, July 30, 1907, “on innersole filler”; and Arnold patent, 808,227, December 26, 1905, covering “shoe-filling apparatus” — has brought this suit against defendants, charging infringement. It is before the court upon an application for an injunction pendente lite, and. has been presented upon the bill, the answer, and supporting and opposing affidavits of the parties respectively.

These patents, relating as they do to the shoe-filling art, may be better understood upon brief reference to certain figures and the subject-matter of the patent to Howland, 458,421, August 25, 1891:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

North American Chemical Co. v. Dexter, 252 F. 148, 1916 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 908 (E.D. Wis. 1916).

252 F. 148 (North American Chemical Co. v. Dexter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North American Chemical Co. v. Dexter
252 F. 169 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1918)