North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor

235 F.2d 863
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedSeptember 18, 1956
Docket12041_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 235 F.2d 863 (North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor, 235 F.2d 863 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us now on remand from the Supreme Court, American Airlines v. North American Airlines, 351 U.S. 79, 76 S.Ct. 600. In the light of the decision of the Supreme Court we hold that upon consideration of the record as a whole the finding of the Board that the use by petitioner of the name “North American Airlines, Inc.,” “North American Airlines,” or “North American,” causes substantial public confusion which is likely to continue, is supported by the evidence. We accordingly affirm the order of the Board insofar as it denies the application of petitioner for authority to engage in air transportation under the name North American Airlines, Inc., and orders it to cease and desist from engaging in air transportation under the names North American Airlines, Inc., North American Airlines, or North American. But the evidence does not support the finding of the Board that the term “American” had acquired a secondary meaning before petitioner incorporated that term in its name or changed its corporate name, or the finding that such secondary meaning continues to exist. Accordingly, we set aside the order of the Board insofar as it orders petitioner to cease and desist engaging in air transportation under any other name which includes the word “American.”

In view of the foregoing and because of the representations made to us by motion of intervenor, American Airlines, Inc., that during the pendency of the remand petitioner has abandoned *864 the use of the name North American Airlines, Inc., and is now using the name “Trans American Airlines,” the case will be remanded to the Board for such further proceedings as it may be advised, and as are consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 F.2d 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-american-airlines-inc-v-civil-aeronautics-board-american-cadc-1956.