North Amer. Bk. Tr. v. Sulton Rlty., No. Cv92 29 24 41 S (Apr. 25, 1995)
This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 3261 (North Amer. Bk. Tr. v. Sulton Rlty., No. Cv92 29 24 41 S (Apr. 25, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On July 29, 1992, North American filed a complaint seeking a judgment of strict foreclosure against numerous defendants including Sultan Realty Corporation, the mortgagor. On May 17, 1994, the court, Vertefeuille, J., entered a judgment of strict foreclosure and set law days to begin November 22, 1994. The court found the debt to be $659,317.32, awarded an appraisal fee of $3,000.00, an attorney's fee of $7,822.50, and a title search fee of $750.00. The court found the fair market value of the two properties to be $440,000.00.
On November 21, 1994, the court, Hauser, J., opened the judgment and set new law days to begin January 3, 1995. The court indicated in its order that it would consider extending the law day to January 31, 1995, if the defendants paid $9,000.00 to North American. The defendants did not pay $9,000.00 to North American.
On December 21, 1994, the defendants' filed another motion to reopen the judgment. They requested "an extension of the law date to February 28, 1995." This motion was heard and denied by the court, Thim, J., on January 3, 1995. The defendants appealed this denial. Practice Book § 4046 provides for an automatic stay of execution of a judgment during the appeal process. North American has moved to terminate the stay of execution.
Practice Book § 4046 provides in relevant part "In all actions, . . . proceedings to enforce or carry out the judgment shall be automatically stayed until the time to take an appeal has expired; if an appeal is filed, such proceedings shall be stayed until the final determination of the cause. . . ." This section stays the enforceability of a foreclosure judgment provided a timely appeal is taken from that judgment. See, e.g., Farmers andMechanics Savings Bank v. Sullivan,
It is within the trial court's discretion to determine whether due administration of justice warrants the termination of a stay of execution. Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. v. Benedict,
In the present case, the defendants have taken their appeal from a denial of a motion to reopen judgment and extend the law days to February 28, 1995. Because February 28, 1995 has now passed, the defendants have obtained the relief which they sought in their motion. The stay of execution has ceased to serve its intended function as the issue underlying the appeal is now moot. The due administration of justice compels the court to grant North American's motion to terminate the stay of execution.
THIM, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 3261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-amer-bk-tr-v-sulton-rlty-no-cv92-29-24-41-s-apr-25-1995-connsuperct-1995.