Nortek, Inc. v. Alexander Grant & Company, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants v. Sani Distributors, Inc., Third Party

536 F.2d 624, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7696
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided August 5, 1976·No. 75-1030·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant correctly asserts that the Florida blue-sky law’s two-year statute of limitation does not bar its cause of action for gross negligence. This is governed by the Florida fraud statute of limitation, and appellant alleges that its complaint falls within this three-year period. However, the trial court found conclusively that defendant’s action did not constitute fraud or gross negligence, a finding with which we agree. We, therefore, put aside all problems of date of discovery and decline to consider further whether the negligence here was so gross as to constitute constructive fraud. See State Street Trust Co. v. Ernst, 278 N.Y. 104, 15 N.E.2d 416 (1938). The petition for rehearing is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nortek, Inc. v. Alexander Grant & Company, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants v. Sani Distributors, Inc., Third Party, 536 F.2d 624, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7696 (3d Cir. 1976).

536 F.2d 624 (Nortek, Inc. v. Alexander Grant & Company, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants v. Sani Distributors, Inc., Third Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related