Norsworthy v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Norsworthy v. State

178 S.E. 326, 50 Ga. App. 433, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 351

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 26, 1935

Docket24587

StatusPublished

This text of 178 S.E. 326 (Norsworthy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norsworthy v. State, 178 S.E. 326, 50 Ga. App. 433, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 351 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, 0. J.

The verdict was amply supported by the evidence, the testimony of the defendant’s accomplice being corroborated by other evidence, including incriminatory admissions made by the accused; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur. II. E. Goales, Lovejoy Boyer, lor plaintiff in error. M. II. Boyer, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, 0. J.

The verdict was amply supported by the evidence, the testimony of the defendant’s accomplice being corroborated by other evidence, including incriminatory admissions made by the accused; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur. II. E. Goales, Lovejoy Boyer, lor plaintiff in error. M. II. Boyer, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 S.E. 326, 50 Ga. App. 433, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norsworthy-v-state-gactapp-1935.