Norstrom v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Norstrom v. State

616 So. 2d 592, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4327, 1993 WL 100140

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 1993

DocketNo. 89-1966

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 616 So. 2d 592 (Norstrom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norstrom v. State, 616 So. 2d 592, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4327, 1993 WL 100140 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reconsider this appeal in accordance with the supreme court’s opinion in State v. Norstrom, 613 So.2d 437 (Fla.1993). In doing so, we have reviewed all issues not resolved by our opinion in Norstrom v. State, 587 So.2d 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

We find error only as to one sentencing issue. Appellant should not have been convicted of both reckless driving and vehicular homicide. Cf. Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), superseded in part by the 1988 amendment to section 775.021(4) of the Florida Statutes; State v. Barritt, 531 So.2d 338 (Fla.1988).

As to all other issues, we affirm. We remand for amendment of the judgment and sentence in accordance with this opinion.

LETTS, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI