Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Norstrom v. State

Norstrom v. State

616 So. 2d 592, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4327, 1993 WL 100140
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 1993·No. No. 89-1966·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reconsider this appeal in accordance with the supreme court’s opinion in State v. Norstrom, 613 So.2d 437 (Fla.1993). In doing so, we have reviewed all issues not resolved by our opinion in Norstrom v. State, 587 So.2d 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

We find error only as to one sentencing issue. Appellant should not have been convicted of both reckless driving and vehicular homicide. Cf. Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), superseded in part by the 1988 amendment to section 775.021(4) of the Florida Statutes; State v. Barritt, 531 So.2d 338 (Fla.1988).

As to all other issues, we affirm. We remand for amendment of the judgment and sentence in accordance with this opinion.

LETTS, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norstrom v. State, 616 So. 2d 592, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4327, 1993 WL 100140 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

616 So. 2d 592 (Norstrom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stephens v. State
898 S.W.2d 435 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995)
Reed v. State
616 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)