Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States

29 Ct. Int'l Trade 950, 391 F. Supp. 2d 1326
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 350 F. Supp. 2d 1172
United States Court of International Trade·Decided July 1, 2005·No. Court No. 03-00828·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

POGUE, Judge:

In Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, 29 CIT_, Slip Op. 05-58 (May 17, 2005), this court remanded Commerce’s determination in Pure Magnesium and Alloy Magnesium from Canada, 68 Fed. Reg. 53,962 (Dep’t Commerce Sept. 15, 2003) (final results of countervailing duty administrative review) to “ ‘review and determine the amount of any net countervailable subsidy,’ and specifically [to] ‘ensure that the amount of the countervailing duty imposed is equal to the amount of the countervailable sub[951]*951sidy.” ’Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc., 29 CIT at_, Slip Op. 05-58 at 2 (quoting 19 U.S.C. § 1675(a) and Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, 28 CIT_, 350 F. Supp. 2d 1172, 1864 (2005)). On July 18, 2005, Commerce issued a remand determination complying with the court’s instructions.

After reviewing Commerce’s remand determination, the parties’ comments and the rebuttals thereto, and all other papers on file herein, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Department of Commerce’s remand determination is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, 29 Ct. Int'l Trade 950, 391 F. Supp. 2d 1326 (cit 2005).

29 Ct. Int'l Trade 950 (Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norsk Hydro Canada Inc. v. United States
350 F. Supp. 2d 1172 (Court of International Trade, 2004)