Norris v. Watson

S.D. Ohio

Norris v. Watson

DecidedSeptember 25, 2025

Docket3:25-cv-00133

StatusUnknown

This text of Norris v. Watson (Norris v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norris v. Watson, (S.D. Ohio 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION (DAYTON)

ADAM T. NORRIS II [A808915], : Case No. 3:25-cv-00133 : Petitioner, : District Judge Michael J. Newman : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry vs. : : WARDEN, NORTH CENTRAL : CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, : : Respondent. :

ORDER CONCERNING MAIL FROM THIS COURT

Petitioner, a prisoner in the custody of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (“ODRC”), is seeking habeas corpus relief in this Court. In order to manage the case in a timely and efficient manner, the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge hereby ORDERS that mail from this Court addressed to Petitioner in this case is legal mail under Sallier v. Brooks, 343 F.3d 868, 877 (6th Cir. 2003). The ODRC is ORDERED to treat this Court’s mail to Petitioner in this case as legal mail regardless of whether it bears a “control number.” The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this Order on (1) the Ohio Attorney General’s Office at 30 E. Broad Street, 23rd Floor, Columbus, OH 43215; and (2) the Mailroom Supervisor at North Central Correctional Complex. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Caroline H. Gentry CAROLINE H. GENTRY United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION (DAYTON)

ADAM T. NORRIS II [A808915], : Case No. 3:25-cv-00133 : Petitioner, : District Judge Michael J. Newman : Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry vs. : : WARDEN, NORTH CENTRAL : CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, : : Respondent. :

ORDER CONCERNING MAIL FROM THIS COURT

Petitioner, a prisoner in the custody of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (“ODRC”), is seeking habeas corpus relief in this Court. In order to manage the case in a timely and efficient manner, the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge hereby ORDERS that mail from this Court addressed to Petitioner in this case is legal mail under Sallier v. Brooks, 343 F.3d 868, 877 (6th Cir. 2003). The ODRC is ORDERED to treat this Court’s mail to Petitioner in this case as legal mail regardless of whether it bears a “control number.” The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this Order on (1) the Ohio Attorney General’s Office at 30 E. Broad Street, 23rd Floor, Columbus, OH 43215; and (2) the Mailroom Supervisor at North Central Correctional Complex. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Caroline H. Gentry CAROLINE H. GENTRY United States Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Norris v. Watson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norris-v-watson-ohsd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack