Norris v. State

674 So. 2d 761, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3699, 1996 WL 169197
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 1996·No. No. 95-2069·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Scott Norris, also known as Brian Scott Norris (Norris), appeals his convictions and his adult sentences. We agree with the State that Norris properly was sentenced as an adult, and that no double jeopardy violation exists. The State properly concedes however that Norris’s grand theft conviction in case number 94-5285 must be corrected to reflect a conviction for merely petit theft.

We therefore affirm Norris’s convictions and sentences with the exception of his conviction for grand theft. We vacate Norris’s grand theft conviction and remand for correction of Norris’s judgment and sentence accordingly.

MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur. WEBSTER, J., concurs with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norris v. State, 674 So. 2d 761, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3699, 1996 WL 169197 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

674 So. 2d 761 (Norris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldenberg v. REGIONAL IMPORT & EXPORT
674 So. 2d 761 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)