Norris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Norris v. State

674 So. 2d 761, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3699, 1996 WL 169197

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 12, 1996

DocketNo. 95-2069

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 674 So. 2d 761 (Norris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norris v. State, 674 So. 2d 761, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3699, 1996 WL 169197 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Scott Norris, also known as Brian Scott Norris (Norris), appeals his convictions and his adult sentences. We agree with the State that Norris properly was sentenced as an adult, and that no double jeopardy violation exists. The State properly concedes however that Norris’s grand theft conviction in case number 94-5285 must be corrected to reflect a conviction for merely petit theft.

We therefore affirm Norris’s convictions and sentences with the exception of his conviction for grand theft. We vacate Norris’s grand theft conviction and remand for correction of Norris’s judgment and sentence accordingly.

MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur. WEBSTER, J., concurs with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Scott Norris, also known as Brian Scott Norris (Norris), appeals his convictions and his adult sentences. We agree with the State that Norris properly was sentenced as an adult, and that no double jeopardy violation exists. The State properly concedes however that Norris’s grand theft conviction in case number 94-5285 must be corrected to reflect a conviction for merely petit theft.

We therefore affirm Norris’s convictions and sentences with the exception of his conviction for grand theft. We vacate Norris’s grand theft conviction and remand for correction of Norris’s judgment and sentence accordingly.

MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur. WEBSTER, J., concurs with written opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

674 So. 2d 761, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3699, 1996 WL 169197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norris-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack