Norris v. State

407 So. 2d 997, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28183
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 1981·No. No. 81-273·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The sole issue raised on appeal is,whether appellant’s sentence is illegal under Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1980). This point is raised for the first time on appeal, and because Villery suggests that our supreme court contemplated that this issue be brought to the attention of the trial court in the first instance, we do not consider it on this appeal. However, this affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s raising this issue in the trial court by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

BOARDMAN, A. C. J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norris v. State, 407 So. 2d 997, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28183 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

407 So. 2d 997 (Norris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Budget Luxury Inns, Inc. v. Boston
407 So. 2d 997 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Ford v. State
406 So. 2d 76 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)