Norris v. State
This text of 31 So. 551 (Norris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Whether the defendant owned a ¿lis-to!,' or had one about his clothing, at his home in the morning of the day, that he went to a picnic, at which latter plhce, the evidence on the part of the State tended to show a carrying by him at about twelve or one ocloek of the day, in violation of the law, was immaterial and irrelevant. The court -committed no error in sustain[13]*13ing the State’s objection to the question calling for this evidence.—Gaither v. State, 89 Ala. 62. This is the only question presented far consideration. We find no error in the record and the judgment is 'affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 So. 551, 132 Ala. 12, 1902 Ala. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norris-v-state-ala-1902.