Norris v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Norris v. State

31 So. 551, 132 Ala. 12, 1902 Ala. LEXIS 75

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided February 13, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DOWDELL, J.

— Whether the defendant owned a ¿lis-to!,' or had one about his clothing, at his home in the morning of the day, that he went to a picnic, at which latter plhce, the evidence on the part of the State tended to show a carrying by him at about twelve or one ocloek of the day, in violation of the law, was immaterial and irrelevant. The court -committed no error in sustain[13]*13ing the State’s objection to the question calling for this evidence.—Gaither v. State, 89 Ala. 62. This is the only question presented far consideration. We find no error in the record and the judgment is 'affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOWDELL, J.

— Whether the defendant owned a ¿lis-to!,' or had one about his clothing, at his home in the morning of the day, that he went to a picnic, at which latter plhce, the evidence on the part of the State tended to show a carrying by him at about twelve or one ocloek of the day, in violation of the law, was immaterial and irrelevant. The court -committed no error in sustain[13]*13ing the State’s objection to the question calling for this evidence.—Gaither v. State, 89 Ala. 62. This is the only question presented far consideration. We find no error in the record and the judgment is 'affirmed.

Affirmed.

Norris v. State, 31 So. 551, 132 Ala. 12, 1902 Ala. LEXIS 75 (Ala. 1902).

Pincite

31 So. 551 (Norris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related