Norris v. Sigler Daisy Corp.

397 S.E.2d 511, 196 Ga. App. 696, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 1073
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 4, 1990·No. A89A1251·Published

Opinion

Pope, Judge.

This court having entered a judgment in the above-styled case at 193 Ga. App. XXX (1989) affirming, pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 36, the judgment of the trial court, and the judgment of this court having béen reversed on certiorari by the Supreme Court at 260 Ga. 271 (392 SE2d 242) (1990), judgment heretofore rendered by this court is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court.

Judgment reversed.

Banke, P. J., and Sognier, J., concur. [697] Decided September 4, 1990. Sidney L. Moore, Jr., for appellant. Mark Weber, Karen F. Horner, for appellee. Booth, Wade & Campbell, Douglas N. Campbell, Laura E. Stevenson, William A. Trotter III, Dye, Miller, Tucker & Everitt, A. Rowland Dye, Hull, Towill, Norman & Barrett, David E. Hudson, Nixon, Yow, Waller & Capers, John B. Long, amici curiae.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norris v. Sigler Daisy Corp., 397 S.E.2d 511, 196 Ga. App. 696, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 1073 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990).

397 S.E.2d 511 (Norris v. Sigler Daisy Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norris v. Sigler Daisy Corporation
392 S.E.2d 242 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1990)