Norris v. Saxton

32 N.E. 954, 158 Mass. 46, 1893 Mass. LEXIS 226
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 5, 1893·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Barker, J.

The verdict for the plaintiff was upon the count under the Pub. Sts. c. 93, §§ 1, 4, commonly called the law of the road. But the highway where the collision occurred was formed by the junction of Beacon Street and Commonwealth [49] Avenue, in Boston, which at this place crossed each other diagonally. The law of the road does not regulate the manner in which persons shall drive when they meet at the junction of two streets, and could not therefore give the plaintiff a right of action. Garrigan v. Berry, 12 Allen, 84. See also Lovejoy v. Dolan, 10 Cush. 495, 497. As the statute did not apply, the verdict founded upon it must be set aside, and a new trial granted. We see no occasion to discuss the numerous exceptions argued, and express no opinion upon them. Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norris v. Saxton, 32 N.E. 954, 158 Mass. 46, 1893 Mass. LEXIS 226 (Mass. 1893).

32 N.E. 954 (Norris v. Saxton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wagner v. Kloster
188 Iowa 174 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1920)
Buzick v. Todman
179 Iowa 1019 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1917)
Joseph v. Larkworthy
15 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 561 (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, 1913)
Baker v. City of Fall River
72 N.E. 336 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)
Meservey v. Lockett
37 N.E. 310 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
Driscoll v. West End Street Railway Co.
34 N.E. 171 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)