Norris v. Principi

Federal Circuit

Norris v. Principi

30 F. App'x 980

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 11, 2002·No. No. 01-7097·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Danny A. Norris (“Norris”), appeals from an order of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“CAVC”) vacating the March 18, 1999 decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“Board”) and remanding the matter to the Board for readjudication in light of the intervening passage of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (“VCAA”), Pub.L. No. 106-475,114 Stat.2096. Norris v. Principi, No. 99-1171 (Vet.App. Feb. 12, 2001). Because the remand order is not sufficiently final under the test set forth in Williams v. Principi, 275 F.3d 1361, 1363 (Fed.Cir.2002) for purposes of our review, we decline to decide the matter on the [981] merits. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Danny A. Norris (“Norris”), appeals from an order of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“CAVC”) vacating the March 18, 1999 decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“Board”) and remanding the matter to the Board for readjudication in light of the intervening passage of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (“VCAA”), Pub.L. No. 106-475,114 Stat.2096. Norris v. Principi, No. 99-1171 (Vet.App. Feb. 12, 2001). Because the remand order is not sufficiently final under the test set forth in Williams v. Principi, 275 F.3d 1361, 1363 (Fed.Cir.2002) for purposes of our review, we decline to decide the matter on the [981] merits. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Norris v. Principi, 30 F. App'x 980 (Fed. Cir. 2002).

Pincite

30 F. App'x 980 (Norris v. Principi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related