Norris v. Howe

15 Mass. 175
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJune 15, 1818
StatusPublished

This text of 15 Mass. 175 (Norris v. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norris v. Howe, 15 Mass. 175 (Mass. 1818).

Opinion

Sed per Curiam.

It might often occur, from the extremity of the weather, or from other unavoidable causes, that no bidders would appear at the time and place appointed, by an administrator, for the sale of the estate of his intestate. In such case, it would be his duty to adjourn the sale. If, herein, he should act bona fide, and without fraud, his doings must be supported. No suggestión of improper motive is *made as to the sale in this case. The objection made by the tenant cannot, therefore, prevail.

Williams for the demandant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Mass. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norris-v-howe-mass-1818.