Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Norris v. Hess Bright Co.

Norris v. Hess Bright Co.

185 Ill. App. 262
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMarch 9, 1914
DocketGen. No. 18,637
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 185 Ill. App. 262 (Norris v. Hess Bright Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Norris v. Hess Bright Co., 185 Ill. App. 262 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Master and servant, § 37*—when letter does not constitute notice to cancel contract of employment. Under a contract of employment requiring three months’ notice to cancel the same, a letter written by the employer to the employe stating that “the best way to relieve us of an embarrassing situation would he for you to immediately set about looking for another business connection and resign,” etc., held not to constitute a discharge nor a notice of the desire of the employer to cancel the contract.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Interstate Folding Box Co. v. LaMode Garment Manufacturing Co.
22 N.E.2d 769 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1939)
Brownholtz v. Providers Life Assurance Co.
236 Ill. App. 494 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1925)
Horton v. Wickwire Spencer Steel Corp.
239 Mass. 584 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 Ill. App. 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norris-v-hess-bright-co-illappct-1914.