Norris v. Detar
This text of 5 Blackf. 31 (Norris v. Detar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE affidavit of a claimant of goods, taken in execution as the property of another, must show whether the claim is absolute or conditional, and, if it be conditional, whether it is by deed or by parol. Humble v. Williams, 4 Blackf. 473.—Stat. 1834, p. 195. (Acc. Rev. Stat. 1838, p. 490).
If the affidavit in such case be defective, the Court below may permit the claimant to amend on payment of costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Blackf. 31, 1838 Ind. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norris-v-detar-ind-1838.