Norris v. Brown

143 S.E. 878, 146 S.C. 279, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 124
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 28, 1928·No. 12475·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Brease.

This is an appeal from an order of his Honor. Judge Sease,. dissolving a temporary restraining order or injunction issued by him September 9, 1927. Eet the order of Judge Sease be reported.

Under the view which we take of the case, it is unnecessary to recite at length the facts. The granting or refusing an injunction rests within the sound discretion of the Circuit Judge. Frederick v. Brown, 115 S. C., 415; 106 S. E., 31. Pelzer v. Hughes, 27 S. C., 408; 3 S. E., 781. Cooper v. Boylston, 120 S. C., 381; 113 S. E., 347; 32 C. J., p. 29, et seq. Appellants have failed to satisfy this *281 Court that his Honor, the Circuit Judge, erroneously exercised his discretion in dissolving the temporary injunction.

The judgment of this Court is that the order appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Watts and Messrs. Justices Cothran and Carter concur. Mr. Justice Stabeer did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norris v. Brown, 143 S.E. 878, 146 S.C. 279, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 124 (S.C. 1928).

143 S.E. 878 (Norris v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County Council of Charleston v. Felkel
137 S.E.2d 577 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1964)