Norris v. Brown
This text of 143 S.E. 878 (Norris v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an appeal from an order of his Honor. Judge Sease,. dissolving a temporary restraining order or injunction issued by him September 9, 1927. Eet the order of Judge Sease be reported.
Under the view which we take of the case, it is unnecessary to recite at length the facts. The granting or refusing an injunction rests within the sound discretion of the Circuit Judge. Frederick v. Brown, 115 S. C., 415; 106 S. E., 31. Pelzer v. Hughes, 27 S. C., 408; 3 S. E., 781. Cooper v. Boylston, 120 S. C., 381; 113 S. E., 347; 32 C. J., p. 29, et seq. Appellants have failed to satisfy this *281 Court that his Honor, the Circuit Judge, erroneously exercised his discretion in dissolving the temporary injunction.
The judgment of this Court is that the order appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
143 S.E. 878, 146 S.C. 279, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norris-v-brown-sc-1928.