Norris v. Beach
2 Johns. 294
Opinion
We have power to compel the attendance of witnesses, and when they do attend we are bound to protect them redeundo. Take your rule.
Rule granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Norris v. Beach, 2 Johns. 294 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1807).
2 Johns. 294 (Norris v. Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ryan v. ICE
First Circuit, 2020
In re Chase National Bank
134 Misc. 728 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1929)
Christian v. Williams
20 S.W. 96 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Wilson v. Donaldson
3 L.R.A. 266 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1889)
Palmer v. Rowan
21 Neb. 452 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1887)
Ex parte Schulenburg
25 F. 211 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1885)
Mitchell v. Huron Circuit Judge
53 Mich. 541 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)
Larned v. Griffin
12 F. 590 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1882)
Atchison v. Morris
11 F. 582 (N.D. Illinois, 1882)
Bridges v. Sheldon
7 F. 17 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1880)
Jones v. Knauss
31 N.J. Eq. 211 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1879)
Thompson's Case
122 Mass. 428 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1877)
Pollard v. Union Pacific Railroad
7 Abb. Pr. 70 (New York Supreme Court, 1869)
Ex parte Harlan
39 Ala. 563 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1865)
Merrill v. George
23 How. Pr. 331 (New York Supreme Court, 1862)
Hardenbrook's Case
8 Abb. Pr. 416 (New York Supreme Court, 1859)
Bishop v. Vose
27 Conn. 1 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1858)
Cole v. M'Clellan
4 Hill & Den. 59 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1842)