Norris B. Ellis v. Sewall B. Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland

Fourth Circuit

Norris B. Ellis v. Sewall B. Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland

17 F.3d 1433, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12193, 1994 WL 66013

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 2, 1994

Docket93-6575

StatusPublished

This text of 17 F.3d 1433 (Norris B. Ellis v. Sewall B. Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Norris B. Ellis v. Sewall B. Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 17 F.3d 1433, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12193, 1994 WL 66013 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

17 F.3d 1433
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Norris B. ELLIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Sewall B. SMITH, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-6575.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1994.
Decided March 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-92-1724-WN)

Norris B. Ellis, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary O'Malley Lunden, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ellis v. Smith, No. CA-92-1724-WN (D. Md. May 21, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

17 F.3d 1433
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Norris B. ELLIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Sewall B. SMITH, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-6575.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1994.
Decided March 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-92-1724-WN)

Norris B. Ellis, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary O'Malley Lunden, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ellis v. Smith, No. CA-92-1724-WN (D. Md. May 21, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 F.3d 1433, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12193, 1994 WL 66013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norris-b-ellis-v-sewall-b-smith-warden-attorney-ge-ca4-1994.