Normile v. Allstate Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Normile v. Allstate Insurance

462 N.E.2d 1201, 61 N.Y.2d 902, 474 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4151

DecidedFebruary 28, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 462 N.E.2d 1201 (Normile v. Allstate Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Normile v. Allstate Insurance, 462 N.E.2d 1201, 61 N.Y.2d 902, 474 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4151 (N.Y. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz: Whether the rights of plaintiff-appellant under the Fourteenth Amendment were denied. Plaintiff-appellant argued that he was denied due process of law and equal protection of the law by the limitation on his right to recovery pursuant to section 671 of the New York State Insurance Law. The Court of Appeals considered plaintiff-appellant’s contentions and held that there were no violations of his constitutional rights. [See 60 NY2d 1003.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz: Whether the rights of plaintiff-appellant under the Fourteenth Amendment were denied. Plaintiff-appellant argued that he was denied due process of law and equal protection of the law by the limitation on his right to recovery pursuant to section 671 of the New York State Insurance Law. The Court of Appeals considered plaintiff-appellant’s contentions and held that there were no violations of his constitutional rights. [See 60 NY2d 1003.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

462 N.E.2d 1201, 61 N.Y.2d 902, 474 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/normile-v-allstate-insurance-ny-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack