Normand v. Gremillion Bros. Implement

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Normand v. Gremillion Bros. Implement

56 So. 2d 315, 1951 La. App. LEXIS 985

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 15, 1951

DocketNo. 7767

StatusPublished

This text of 56 So. 2d 315 (Normand v. Gremillion Bros. Implement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Normand v. Gremillion Bros. Implement, 56 So. 2d 315, 1951 La. App. LEXIS 985 (La. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

HARDY, Judge.

This suit was consolidated for trial and purposes of appeal with the suit entitled Aymond v. Gremillion Brothers Implement Company, La.App., 56 So.2d 311.

Stipulation of counsel and joint motion for consolidation of appeals, despite minor and immaterial differences of fact in the cases, have the effect of making applicable to this cause the judgment rendered in the above numbered and styled cause.

For the reasons set forth in the case noted it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is hereby reversed and set aside and judgment is now rendered sustaining the plea of prescription filed by defendants, and plaintiff’s demands are rejected and suit dismissed at his cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARDY, Judge.

This suit was consolidated for trial and purposes of appeal with the suit entitled Aymond v. Gremillion Brothers Implement Company, La.App., 56 So.2d 311.

Stipulation of counsel and joint motion for consolidation of appeals, despite minor and immaterial differences of fact in the cases, have the effect of making applicable to this cause the judgment rendered in the above numbered and styled cause.

For the reasons set forth in the case noted it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is hereby reversed and set aside and judgment is now rendered sustaining the plea of prescription filed by defendants, and plaintiff’s demands are rejected and suit dismissed at his cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 So. 2d 315, 1951 La. App. LEXIS 985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/normand-v-gremillion-bros-implement-lactapp-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack